Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 February 20223282782

47 Cranleigh Court Road, Yate, Bristol, BS37 5DQ

Planning appeal 3282782 at 47 Cranleigh Court Road, Yate, Bristol, BS37 5DQ (South Gloucestershire Council) was dismissed on 25 February 2022 by Inspector Howell M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

for a new detached house with allocated parking space, cycle rack and bins store

Authority
South Gloucestershire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Howell M
Postcode
BS37 5DQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of 47 and 49 Cranleigh Court Road, with regard to light and outlook
  • Whether the proposed development would provide adequate accommodation for future occupants, with regard to the size and shape of the private outdoor space

What decided it

The proposed development fails on three independent grounds: it damages the character and appearance of the area by being out of keeping with the spacious plot pattern; it unacceptably harms the living conditions of neighbouring occupants through overbearing impact and loss of light; and it fails to provide adequate private outdoor space for future occupants.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1Policy PSP1Policy PSP38Policy PSP8Policy PSP43
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 12

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

44 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Gloucestershire Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266012302
    61 Durban Road, Bristol, BS34 5HG
  2. Allowed16 October 20266014921
    Land At 39 Bude Road, Filton, BS34 7HW
  3. Dismissed13 October 20266011871
    49 Court Road, Kingswood, Bristol, BS15 9QG
  4. Dismissed13 October 20266010963
    Elmbarn Farm, Westerleigh Road, Westerleigh, BS37 8QF
  5. Dismissed13 October 20266009931
    Land at Wapley Road, Codrington, Bristol, BS37 6RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.