Planning appeal decision
45 Belgrave Gardens, Southgate, London, N14 4TS
Planning appeal 3283540 at 45 Belgrave Gardens, Southgate, London, N14 4TS (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 6 June 2022 by Inspector Philpott M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.
erection of two storey detached dwelling house on land to the rear of No 45 Belgrave Gardens, including new vehicular access from rear laneway, off-street parking, landscaping and all associated site works
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Philpott M
- Postcode
- N14 4TS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the implications of the proposal in respect of car parking
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of Nos 43 and 45 Belgrave Gardens, with particular regard to outlook, light and privacy
- whether the proposal would provide satisfactory standards of accommodation for the future occupiers, with particular regard to outlook, light, ventilation, ceiling heights and room sizes
What decided it
The harm to character and appearance caused by the incongruous siting of a detached dwelling in rear garden land, combined with the failure to promote sustainable transport through provision of off-street parking in a well-connected location, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited housing benefits of a single dwelling.
The benefits of housing delivery and family-sized accommodation in an accessible location were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance and failure to promote sustainable transport, with the Framework not indicating in favour of development and the proposal conflicting with the development plan.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- London Plan Policy D3London Plan Policy D4London Plan Policy T6London Plan Policy T6.1London Plan Policy T1London Plan Policy T2London Plan Policy GG1London Plan Policy GG2London Plan Policy H2London Plan Policy D6Development Management Document Policy DMD6Development Management Document Policy DMD7Development Management Document Policy DMD8Development Management Document Policy DMD9Development Management Document Policy DMD10Development Management Document Policy DMD37Enfield Plan Core Strategy Policy CP4Enfield Plan Core Strategy Policy CP30
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Allowed28 August 202660083619 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
- Dismissed20 July 2026601035019 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
- Dismissed3 June 202660048031 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®