Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 August 20223283564

266 Hempstead Road, Hempstead, GILLINGHAM, ME7 3QH

proposed alterations of an existing bungalow to form new access from the Paddock and construction of a 4 bed/ 5 person detached house on the front garden; all with associated vehicular parking areas

Authority
Medway Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Evans L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the adjoining neighbours at No. 264 Hempstead Road

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the local area caused by the visual discordance of introducing a dwelling at the front of the semi-detached pair, leaving the other half set back in isolation, outweighs the modest housing supply benefits.

The modest social and economic benefits of providing one additional housing unit were outweighed by the significant harm to the character and appearance of the local area; the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 12, 60, 69, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy BNE1, Policy BNE2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.