Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed10 March 20223284041

Naylor House, 56 Bruckner St, London, W10 4NU

Planning appeal 3284041 at Naylor House, 56 Bruckner St, London, W10 4NU (City of Westminster Council) was allowed on 10 March 2022 by Inspector Allen M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, bearing in mind the location outside, but near to, the Queen's Park Estate Conservation Area.

the installation of 3no. 3.00m support poles (30.10m above ground level) supporting 4no. antennas, 1no. 5.50m support pole (32.60m AGL) supporting 2no. antennas and 2no. 300mm dishes, installation of 3no. equipment cabinets and ancillary works thereto

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Allen M
Postcode
W10 4NU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area, bearing in mind the location outside, but near to, the Queen's Park Estate Conservation Area

What decided it

The siting and appearance of the proposed development would be acceptable as the apparatus would be viewed as minor visual elements within the context of a large, imposing building that is not free from existing external paraphernalia, and would cause no harm to the character and appearance of the area or the setting of the nearby conservation area.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy S25Policy S28Policy DES1Policy DES6Policy DES9Policy 19QAPolicy 38Policy 39Policy 40

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 760 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Westminster Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed1 June 20263375823
    Chelwood House, Gloucester Square, London, W2 2SY
  2. Dismissed14 January 20253350000
    Montagu Court, 27-29 Montagu Square, London, W1H 2LG
  3. Allowed28 December 20233327993
    Bayswater Ate, Moscow Road, Westminster, London, W2 4LH
  4. Allowed28 December 20233324186
    Bayswater Automatic Telephone Exchange, Moscow Road, Westminster, London, W2 4LH
  5. Dismissed10 November 20223297611
    Barrie House, Lancaster Gate, London, W2 3QJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.