Planning appeal decision
Bridgefield House, 219 Queensway, LONDON, W2 5HR
installation of 6No. antenna apertures across 3No. steel support structures (approx. 29.75m AGL to top), 4No. 600mm diameter dishes across 4No. support structures & 8No. cabinets all at rooftop level, 1No. Meter Cabinet at ground level plus ancillary works
- Authority
- City of Westminster Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Jones RE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the building and the surrounding area, including the setting of the Grade II* listed Porchester Centre, the Queensway Conservation Area and the adjoining Westbourne and Bayswater Conservation Areas
- whether or not the harm identified to the building and significance of designated heritage assets would be outweighed by the proposal's public benefits
What decided it
The significant public benefits of reinstating and improving digital communications networks essential for economic growth and social well-being outweighed the moderate level of less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets.
Framework references: 114, 202, 55
Plan policies cited: Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 40, Policy 19
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®