Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 May 20223284151

Bridgefield House, 219 Queensway, LONDON, W2 5HR

installation of 6No. antenna apertures across 3No. steel support structures (approx. 29.75m AGL to top), 4No. 600mm diameter dishes across 4No. support structures & 8No. cabinets all at rooftop level, 1No. Meter Cabinet at ground level plus ancillary works

Authority
City of Westminster Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Jones RE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the building and the surrounding area, including the setting of the Grade II* listed Porchester Centre, the Queensway Conservation Area and the adjoining Westbourne and Bayswater Conservation Areas
  • whether or not the harm identified to the building and significance of designated heritage assets would be outweighed by the proposal's public benefits

What decided it

The significant public benefits of reinstating and improving digital communications networks essential for economic growth and social well-being outweighed the moderate level of less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets.

Framework references: 114, 202, 55

Plan policies cited: Policy 38, Policy 39, Policy 40, Policy 19

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.