Planning appeal decision
Bridgefield House, 219 Queensway, London, W2 5HR
Planning appeal 3284151 at Bridgefield House, 219 Queensway, London, W2 5HR (City of Westminster Council) was allowed on 13 May 2022 by Inspector Jones RE, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the building and the surrounding area, including the setting of the Grade II* listed Porchester Centre, the Queensway Conservation Area and the adjoining Westbourne and Bayswater Conservation Areas.
installation of 6No. antenna apertures across 3No. steel support structures (approx. 29.75m AGL to top), 4No. 600mm diameter dishes across 4No. support structures & 8No. cabinets all at rooftop level, 1No. Meter Cabinet at ground level plus ancillary works
- Authority
- City of Westminster Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Jones RE
- Postcode
- W2 5HR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the building and the surrounding area, including the setting of the Grade II* listed Porchester Centre, the Queensway Conservation Area and the adjoining Westbourne and Bayswater Conservation Areas
- whether or not the harm identified to the building and significance of designated heritage assets would be outweighed by the proposal's public benefits
What decided it
The significant public benefits of reinstating and improving digital communications networks essential for economic growth and social well-being outweighed the moderate level of less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 38Policy 39Policy 40Policy 19
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 114Paragraph 202Paragraph 55
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in City of Westminster Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed1 June 20263375823Chelwood House, Gloucester Square, London, W2 2SY
- Dismissed14 January 20253350000Montagu Court, 27-29 Montagu Square, London, W1H 2LG
- Allowed28 December 20233327993Bayswater Ate, Moscow Road, Westminster, London, W2 4LH
- Allowed28 December 20233324186Bayswater Automatic Telephone Exchange, Moscow Road, Westminster, London, W2 4LH
- Dismissed10 November 20223297611Barrie House, Lancaster Gate, London, W2 3QJ
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®