Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 February 20223284543

3 Windmill Gardens, ENFIELD, EN2 7DZ

described on the application form as “Single storey rear extension

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Dale A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the proposed extension upon the character and appearance of the dwelling and its surroundings
  • The effects of the proposed extension upon the amenity and living conditions of the occupiers of the adjoining properties with regard to outlook, light and sense of enclosure

What decided it

The proposed extension would conflict with the development plan by exceeding the 3m depth limit for terraced house extensions and would cause unacceptable harm to the outlook and sense of enclosure of the neighbouring property at no. 1 Windmill Gardens.

Plan policies cited: Policy DMD 11, Policy DMD 37, Core Policy 30, Policy D4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.