Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 March 20223284985

326 Lees Road, Oldham, OL4 1NZ

Planning appeal 3284985 at 326 Lees Road, Oldham, OL4 1NZ (Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 31 March 2022 by Inspector Taylor K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to biodiversity and the implications for the retention and health of trees.

double side extension with apartment to first floor with Cafe to ground floor

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Taylor K
Postcode
OL4 1NZ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to biodiversity and the implications for the retention and health of trees

What decided it

The adverse impacts of harm to trees, biodiversity and character and appearance, combined with the limited benefits of a single residential unit and café, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits even in the context of the Council's substantial housing land supply shortfall.

the adverse impacts of granting planning permission would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy 21 of the Oldham Local Development Framework Development Plan Document – Joint Core Strategy and Development Management Policies, 2011Policy D1.5 of the Oldham Metropolitan Borough Unitary Development Plan, Saved Policies, 2006
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 174Paragraph 180

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

67 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed5 October 20266013585
    49 Chamber Road, Shaw, OL2 7AR
  2. Dismissed20 August 20266009498
    The Vestacare Stadium Whitebank Road, Oldham, OL8 3JH
  3. Dismissed10 August 20266009617
    The Stables, 67 Thornham Road, Shaw, OL2 7HR
  4. Dismissed6 August 20266008648
    Bottom Field Farm, Medlock Road, Oldham, M35 9UA
  5. Notice varied and upheld29 June 20263372628
    97 Green Lane, Oldham, OL8 3BB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.