Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 December 20213284988

11 St. Margarets Road, London, E12 5DR

the installation of 5 solar panels to the front façade of the house

Authority
London Borough of Redbridge
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
utilities-energy · Householder developments
Inspector
Barnes D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host property and the streetscene

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area's character and appearance, and the significance of this designated heritage asset, was not outweighed by the public benefits of renewable energy generation.

The benefits of renewable energy generation and domestic electricity production did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and the significance of this heritage asset.

Plan policies cited: Policy LP33, Policy LP26

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.