Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 June 20223285369

102-104 Tanners Lane, Barkingside, Ilford, Essex, IG6 1QE

a three-storey extension to contain up to six (3 x bedroom) self-contained flats with associated balcony amenity areas, mezzanine floor commercial/meeting area, refuse and cycle store

Authority
London Borough of Redbridge
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Forrett C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for the future occupiers of the development
  • whether the proposal would impact on the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation

What decided it

The harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the substantial mass and elongated depth necessary to accommodate the quantum of development proposed significantly and demonstrably outweighed the housing benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

The benefits of housing delivery (six additional dwellings and associated social and economic benefits) were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance of the area, with the tilted balance applied but the proposal failing to constitute sustainable development.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan (2021), Policy LP26 of the Redbridge Local Plan 2015-2030

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd. v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another 1982; Crystal Property (London) Limited v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Hackney London Borough Council (2016) EWCA Civ 1265

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.