Planning appeal decision
Bay Hotel, 2 Eastbourne Road, Pevensey Bay, Pevensey, BN24 6EJ
Planning appeal 3285498 at Bay Hotel, 2 Eastbourne Road, Pevensey Bay, Pevensey, BN24 6EJ (Wealden District Council) was allowed on 19 August 2022 by Inspector Holden S, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the significance of The Bay Hotel, a non-designated heritage asset.
a change of use of the ground floor from hotel bar/restaurant to convenience store and 1.5 storey rear extension together with raising the rear balcony and external staircase and alterations to the front elevation. Current hotel rooms above retained with minor internal and external alterations at first floor level
- Authority
- Wealden District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- retail · Change of use
- Inspector
- Holden S
- Postcode
- BN24 6EJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the significance of The Bay Hotel, a non-designated heritage asset
- The effect of the development on the safety and operation of the surrounding highway network having regard to access, parking provision and servicing arrangements
- Whether or not the change of use would result in the unnecessary loss of community facilities
What decided it
The Inspector concluded that the proposal would not cause material harm to the heritage asset, highway safety or community facilities, and therefore accorded with the development plan as a whole.
the limited heritage harm and change in character of the ground floor were outweighed by the retention of an active frontage, preservation of the hotel's principal significance, and absence of highway or community facility harm, so the proposal complied with the development plan as a whole
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EN27Policy TR3Policy TR16Policy WCS14
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 203Paragraph 84Paragraph 93Paragraph 56
- Judgments
- Saga Vishnubhai Patel v Dacorum BC [2019] EWHC 2992 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wealden District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed15 September 20266008314Land off Eastbourne Road, Polegate, BN26 5DD
- Dismissed22 July 20266006344Dog Walking Field, Burnt Oak Road, High Hurstwood, TN22 4AE
- Dismissed15 July 2026600490111 Station Road, Polegate, BN26 6AT
- Allowed2 June 20266004127The Old Nursery, North Street, Cogger Cross, Horam, tn210lg
- Allowed8 April 20266002646Old Spot Farm, Goldbridge Road, Piltdown, TN22 3XN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®