Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 February 20223285614

145a Ashley Road, Hale, WA14 2UW

demolition of existing building and construction of 5no. apartments

Authority
Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Taylor K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Hale Station Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposal upon archaeological interests in the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to overshadowing, outlook and privacy
  • Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with regard to outlook and natural light

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the heritage asset and character of the conservation area, combined with substantial harm to neighbouring living conditions and inadequate living conditions for future occupants, outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery.

The moderate weight given to housing benefits and sustainable location did not outweigh the less than substantial heritage harm (given considerable importance and weight due to the s.72(1) duty), the substantial harm to neighbouring living conditions, and the inadequate living conditions for future occupants.

Framework references: 11, 60, 130, 194, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy L7, Policy R1

Judgments cited: Dorothy Bohm v SSCLG [2017] EWHC 3217

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.