Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 April 20223285769

Land at 102 East Road, West Mersea, Colchester, CO5 8SA

Planning appeal 3285769 at Land at 102 East Road, West Mersea, Colchester, CO5 8SA (Colchester Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 April 2022 by Inspector Palmer N, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the Council can demonstrate a 5 year supply of deliverable housing sites.

residential development of 56 dwellings including landscaping and access from East Road following demolition of existing dwelling

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Palmer N
Postcode
CO5 8SA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the Council can demonstrate a 5 year supply of deliverable housing sites
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on the setting of a heritage asset, and design and density considerations
  • the effect of the development on highway safety

What decided it

The combined and unresolved harms to landscape character, the setting of the listed building, and highway safety were found to outweigh the housing and other benefits, resulting in conflict with the development plan as a whole.

Significant weight given to the social and economic benefits of housing and limited weight to s106 community benefits were not sufficient to outweigh the great weight given to less than substantial heritage harm together with the other identified harms to character/appearance and highway safety.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP4Policy SP1Policy SP8Policy SP9Policy SP6Policy ENV1 (CS)Policy ENV1 (Section 2 Local Plan)Policy DP1Policy DP23Policy ENV2Policy WM22Policy WM26Policy WM12Policy WM1Policy WM2Policy SG1Policy SG2Policy SS12aPolicy OV2Policy UR2Policy H1Policy DP14Policy SP7Policy DM16Policy DM9Policy DM15Policy DP17Policy DM21
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 124
Judgments
Nicholson v Secretary of State for the Environment [1998]; St Anselm Development Co Ltd v First Secretary of State [2003]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

22 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Colchester City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed8 October 20266009395
    Land North of Coggeshall Road, Marks Tey, Colchester, CO6 1LT
  2. Allowed24 September 20266009382
    Land at Colchester Rd, Colchester, CO6 3JX
  3. Dismissed20 February 20263372951
    8 Sussex Road, Colchester, Essex, CO3 3QH
  4. Allowed2 February 20263372408
    28 Wych Elm, Colchester, CO2 8PR
  5. Allowed14 January 20263374737
    1 Harsnett Road, Colchester, CO1 2HS

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.