Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision11 February 20223285880

16 Slades Hill, London, EN2 7DH

Single storey lean to conservatory extension at rear/side with extension to patio with balustrade, outdoor shower unit, replacement of side fence and detached gym at rear (Retrospective)

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Dale A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the development upon the character and appearance of the host property and its immediate surroundings and upon the amenities of the neighbouring property at 14a Slades Hill with particular regard to any sense of enclosure

What decided it

The glazed lean-to extension's excessive depth of 8.7 m (combined rear projection of 13.7 m) far exceeds the 4 m policy limit for detached dwellings, creating a dominant and incongruous structure that harms character and appearance and causes an excessive sense of enclosure to the neighbouring property.

Plan policies cited: Core Policy 30, Policy DMD 11, Policy DMD 12, Policy DMD 37

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.