Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 March 20223286120

Dock Cottage, 140 Stanpit, Christchurch, BH23 3NE

Planning appeal 3286120 at Dock Cottage, 140 Stanpit, Christchurch, BH23 3NE (Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole) was dismissed on 24 March 2022 by Inspector Leonard S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Stanpit and Fisherman's Bank Conservation Area (SFBCA).

demolition of existing home and 2 storey replacement dwelling

Authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Leonard S
Postcode
BH23 3NE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Stanpit and Fisherman's Bank Conservation Area (SFBCA)
  • Whether the proposal provides for adequate on-site car parking provision, having regard to highway safety and the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties
  • Whether the proposal provides for adequate on-site cycle parking provision, having regard to ensuring appropriate opportunities to promote sustainable transport modes

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the designated heritage asset of the Stanpit and Fisherman's Bank Conservation Area, which was not outweighed by any public benefits of the scheme.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HE1Policy HE2Policy H12Policy BE4Policy LN2Policy KS12Policy KS11
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 109Paragraph 200Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

70 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Bournemouth Christchurch and Poole

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 September 20266007836
    65a Richmond Wood Road, Bournemouth, BH8 9DQ
  2. Allowed28 September 20266007175
    281-291 and The Old Joinery, Bournemouth Road, Poole, BH14 9AH
  3. Allowed24 September 20266007187
    5 Higher Blandford Road, Poole, BH18 9AB
  4. Allowed4 September 20266011111
    18 Sandbourne Road, Bournemouth, BH4 8JH
  5. Allowed4 September 20266003539
    Marina Court, 34 Banks Road, Poole, BH13 7QE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.