Planning appeal decision
3B Coleraine Road, LONDON, SE3 7PF
existing windows replacement at the front side of the property”
- Authority
- Royal Borough of Greenwich
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Thomas M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the host villa, wider terrace of villas and the Conservation Area
What decided it
The use of traditional timber material in Appeal B, as opposed to modern PVCu in Appeal A, means the harm to the conservation area is at the very low end of the less than substantial spectrum and is outweighed by the public benefits, whereas the PVCu proposal causes unacceptable harm that cannot be justified.
Framework references: 199, 200, 202
Plan policies cited: HC1, D3, DH1, DH3, DH(h)
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®