Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 February 20223286200

31 Malvern Mews, London, NW6 5PT

Planning appeal 3286200 at 31 Malvern Mews, London, NW6 5PT (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 21 February 2022 by Inspector Glaister C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the single-storey side extension and boundary wall on the living conditions of the occupiers of 87A/87B Malvern Road, with regard to light, outlook, and whether it would be overbearing or create a sense of enclosure.

Remodel and roof extension to existing Mews house to create 2-bedroom dwelling. Fenestration to front and side elevations redesigned and single storey side extension

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Glaister C
Postcode
NW6 5PT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the single-storey side extension and boundary wall on the living conditions of the occupiers of 87A/87B Malvern Road, with regard to light, outlook, and whether it would be overbearing or create a sense of enclosure
  • the effect of the first-floor balcony on the living conditions of the occupiers of 89 Malvern Road, with regard to privacy and overlooking
  • the effect of the first-floor balcony on the character and appearance of the dwelling, and the surrounding area

What decided it

The single-storey side extension and boundary wall would cause unmitigated harm to the living conditions of the occupiers of 87A/87B Malvern Road with regard to light, outlook, overbearing effect, and enclosure, which could not be outweighed by the acceptable aspects of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMP 1

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 713 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266011176
    7 Chalfont Avenue, Wembley, HA9 6NW
  2. Allowed22 October 20266011738
    102 West Hill, Wembley, HA9 9RR
  3. Allowed9 October 20266010212
    276 Willesden Lane, London, NW2 5RB
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266013509
    115 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6RY
  5. Allowed1 October 20266011602
    28A Ridley Road, London, NW10 5UA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.