Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 December 20223286241

89 & 91 Park Avenue East, EPSOM, KT17 2PA

demolition of the existing pool house at 89 and detached bungalow at 91, and the erection of four houses (comprising 4 x 4 bedroom detached chalet bungalows), with associated access and parking

Authority
Epsom and Ewell Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hills J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the area
  • highway safety
  • biodiversity

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance through erosion of spacious garden plots and the linear building pattern, combined with unresolved biodiversity concerns and highway safety issues, outweighed the modest housing supply benefits even under the tilted balance.

The modest economic and social benefits from housing supply contribution and family-sized homes were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, failure to add to overall area quality, lack of demonstrated biodiversity mitigation, and highway safety conflicts, such that adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed benefits under paragraph 11 of the Framework.

Framework references: 11, 124, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy CS1, Policy CS5, Policy CS6, Policy CS16, Policy DM4, Policy DM9, Policy DM10, Policy DM16

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.