Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 March 20223286442

Os No. 2 Head of Steam PH Neville St, Newcastle, NE1 5EN

the erection of freestanding open access communication structure with an integral defibrillator and digital screens

Authority
Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council
Appeal type
advert · Advertisement Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Worthington E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the communications hub would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Central Conservation Area
  • Whether it would preserve the settings of nearby listed buildings
  • The effect of the proposal on the safety of pedestrians and cyclists
  • The effect of the advertisement on visual amenity

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the designated heritage assets and visual amenity of the conservation area, combined with the detrimental effect on pedestrian and cyclist safety, was not outweighed by the limited public benefits of the communications infrastructure and defibrillator.

Framework references: 114, 197, 199, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: Core Strategy Policy CS15, Core Strategy Policy UC5, Core Strategy Policy UC12, Core Strategy Policy UC13, Core Strategy Policy UC14, Core Strategy Policy CS13, DAP Policy DM15, DAP Policy DM16, DAP Policy DM20, DAP Policy DM10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.