Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 July 20223287014

43 Eardley Road, London, SW16 6DA

Planning appeal 3287014 at 43 Eardley Road, London, SW16 6DA (London Borough of Wandsworth) was dismissed on 28 July 2022 by Inspector Rafferty C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether conditions 3 and 4 attached to planning permission 2016/3999 are reasonable and necessary with regards to the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

Alterations including excavation to enlarge basement including formation of front lightwell; erection of two-storey extension and single storey rear extension in connection with conversion of property from a house into 1 x 1 bedroom, 1 x 2 bedroom and 1 x 3 bedroom without complying with conditions attached to planning permission 2016/3999

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Rafferty C
Postcode
SW16 6DA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether conditions 3 and 4 attached to planning permission 2016/3999 are reasonable and necessary with regards to the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • Whether conditions 3 and 4 attached to planning permission 2016/3999 are reasonable and necessary with regards to the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to privacy

What decided it

The balcony's visual prominence and incongruity within the immediate context, combined with the overlooking of neighbouring properties and gardens, made conditions 3 and 4 reasonable and necessary to protect character and appearance and neighbouring living conditions.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
DMS1DMH5

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

437 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Wandsworth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266011378
    First and Second Floor Maisonette, 184 Putney Bridge Road, London, SW15 2NG
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266011258
    8 Mysore Road, London, SW11 5SB
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266010452
    72 Frensham Drive, London, SW15 3EF
  4. Allowed26 October 20266013180
    23, Sutherland Grove, London, SW18 5PS
  5. Dismissed15 October 20266014390
    5 Banbury Street,, London, SW11 3EJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.