Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed27 October 20223287376

Unit 1 Ashby Mews, LONDON, SE4 1TB

the partial demolition of existing light industrial (B1c use) building, alterations and extensions to provide a terrace of 4 two-storey residential dwellings (C3 use) and associated refuse collection facilities, cycle parking and amenity space

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Parkin A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Effect of the proposed development on employment land provision
  • Effect of the proposed development on the significance of designated heritage assets
  • Living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to natural light and outlook
  • Living conditions of future occupiers with particular regard to bicycle use

What decided it

The failure to adequately justify the loss of employment land, combined with less than substantial harm to the Brockley Conservation Area that was not outweighed by the limited public benefits, and inadequate bicycle storage provision that would discourage cycling.

Framework references: 69, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy 5 of the Lewisham Core Strategy 2011, Policy DM11 of the Lewisham Development Management Local Plan 2014, Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021, Policy 15 of the Lewisham Core Strategy 2011, Policy 16 of the Lewisham Core Strategy 2011, Policy DM33 of the Lewisham Development Management Local Plan 2014, Policy DM36 of the Lewisham Development Management Local Plan 2014, Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy DM32 of the Lewisham Development Management Local Plan 2014, Policy T5 of the London Plan 2021, Policy 14 of the Lewisham Core Strategy 2011

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.