Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 June 20223287606

Great Moreton Hall, New Road, Moreton, Congleton, Cheshire, CW12 4RY

Planning appeal 3287606 at Great Moreton Hall, New Road, Moreton, Congleton, Cheshire, CW12 4RY (Cheshire East) was dismissed on 28 June 2022 by Inspector Gilbert-Wooldridge T, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposals would preserve the special interest of the Grade II* listed Great Moreton Hall and the Grade II listed walled garden and outbuildings.

demolition of three existing buildings together with the construction of three dwellings together with the repair and reinstatement of the garden walls and associated original lean-to structures within the Walled Garden

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Gilbert-Wooldridge T
Postcode
CW12 4RY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposals would preserve the special interest of the Grade II* listed Great Moreton Hall and the Grade II listed walled garden and outbuildings
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding landscape (Appeal C only)
  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and any relevant development plan policies (Appeal A only)
  • the effect of the proposals on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt (Appeals A and C only)
  • whether the proposals would be in an appropriate location having regard to the development plan and national policies (Appeals A and C only)
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposals (Appeals A and C only)

What decided it

Whether the heritage conservation benefits of each scheme clearly outweighed the harm caused to the listed buildings and the Green Belt determined the outcome: insufficient in Appeal A (dismissed) but sufficient in Appeal C (allowed).

For Appeal A, the substantial Green Belt harm and significant less-than-substantial heritage harm were not clearly outweighed by the heritage and minor housing/economic benefits, so the appeal was dismissed; for Appeal C, the considerable heritage conservation benefits (reinstatement of the walled garden and removal of 1960s buildings) clearly outweighed the Green Belt, landscape and heritage harm, so very special circumstances existed and the appeal was allowed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SD1Policy SD2Policy SE1Policy SE2Policy SE4Policy SE7Policy CO1Policy PG3Policy BH1Policy BH4Policy BH5Policy PS6Policy PS7Policy H6Policy H16Policy GR9Policy GR10Policy P1Policy P4Policy P11Policy P13Policy P18Policy P26
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 80Paragraph 105Paragraph 110Paragraph 130Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 174Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202
Judgments
Tandridge DC v SSCLG [2015] EWHC 2503 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

10 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cheshire East

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed13 October 20266009638
    The Smithy, Adlington Road, Wilmslow, SK9 2LN
  2. Allowed5 October 20266008576
    Land At Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Racecourse Road - Greaves Road, Wilmslow, SK9 5LW
  3. Allowed2 October 20266010578
    Land at Dunvilles Farm, Bollington Lane, Chelford Road, Monks Heath, Macclesfield, SK10 4UL
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266010213
    Disley Meadow, Lower Greenshall Lane, Disley, SK12 2HH
  5. Allowed30 September 20266008176
    Sycamore Farm, Well Bank Lane, Over Peover, WA16 8UN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.