Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision7 September 20223287934

53 Charlemont Road, WALSALL, WS5 3NQ

without planning permission on the Land, 3.1 The erection of brick walls, pillars and railings between points B-C-D-E-F-G inclusive, marked in the approximate positions on the attached plan. 3.2 The erection of brick retaining walls and timber fence panels between points A-B, and G-H, marked in the approximate positions on the attached plan. 3.3 The alteration and raising of ground levels in the area hatched blue on the attached plan. 3.4 The laying of a hard surface in excess of five square metres in the area hatched blue on the attached plan

Authority
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Madge M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effects of the matters alleged on non-designated heritage assets
  • The effects of the matters alleged on the character and appearance of the street scene
  • The effects of the matters alleged on the disposal of surface water

What decided it

Appeal A succeeded because it alone pursued ground (a) and the Inspector found only negligible/no significant harm capable of mitigation by a landscaping condition, whereas Appeals B, C and D remained dismissed because their grounds (b) and (c) failed and they had not appealed on ground (a).

The negligible harm to non-designated heritage assets and lack of significant visual harm to the street scene, capable of being mitigated by a landscaping and maintenance condition, together with the absence of evidenced drainage harm, meant the development was acceptable and planning permission was granted for Appeal A.

Plan policies cited: ENV2, ENV3, 3.6, GP2, ENV32

Judgments cited: McGaw v The Welsh Ministers [2021] EWCA Civ 976

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.