Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 July 20223288055

Waltham Farm Shurlock Road, Waltham St. Lawrence, Reading, RG10 0HN

extension of existing fishery/fish breeding pond and relocation of existing stock fencing

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
agricultural · Other minor developments
Inspector
Page L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, and any other harm relating to flood risk, biodiversity, and protected species
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, or any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The absence of baseline evidence demonstrating feasible use of excavated spoil and the lack of a site-specific flood risk assessment, combined with insufficient protected species surveys for water voles and failure to follow the biodiversity mitigation hierarchy, meant the identified harms to the Green Belt, flood risk, and biodiversity could not be outweighed by other considerations.

Framework references: 150, 147, 148, 159, 169, 174, 179, 180

Plan policies cited: Policy QP5, Policy NR1, Policy NR2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.