Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 July 20223288183

74 Cedar Avenue, Enfield, EN3 7JD

Planning appeal 3288183 at 74 Cedar Avenue, Enfield, EN3 7JD (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 21 July 2022 by Inspector Cross D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

sub-division of site and erection of 2x semi-detached 2- storey single family dwellings involving hardstanding, associated parking, r efuse and recycling bins

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Cross D
Postcode
EN3 7JD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • The effect of the proposal on flood risk
  • The effect of the proposal on carbon emissions

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with the development plan as a whole in respect of character and appearance, highway safety, and flood risk, and the tilted balance is not engaged because the proposal fails to meet Framework policies on flood risk.

The benefits of providing two new dwellings in a sustainable location were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, unacceptable highway safety impacts, and undemonstrated flood risk mitigation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D4Policy CP 30Policy DMD 7Policy DMD 8Policy DMD 37Policy T1Policy T2Policy T4Policy CP 24Policy CP 25Policy DMD 46Policy DMD 47Policy SI 12Policy SI 13Policy CP 28Policy DMD 59Policy DMD 60Policy DMD 61Policy DMD 62Policy DMD 51Policy SI 2Policy CP 20Policy DMD 53
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

254 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed7 May 20263336102
    70 Sketty Road, Enfield, EN1 3SF
  2. Allowed24 March 20266003066
    45 Park Road, Enfield, EN3 6SP
  3. Dismissed23 March 20263375785
    5 Cocker Road, Enfield, London, EN1 4QQ
  4. Dismissed17 March 20266003971
    5 Ramscroft Close, London, N9 9JY
  5. Allowed10 March 20266004174
    256 Bury Street West, London, N9 9LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.