Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 June 20223288247

32 Richmond Place, Beacon Hill, BATH, BA1 5QA

erection of a two-storey rear extension above an existing extension at lower ground floor level

Authority
Bath and North East Somerset Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Jones M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposals on the special architectural and historic interest of the listed building and whether they would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the conservation area, and their impacts on the World Heritage Site

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the special interest of the listed building and the character of the conservation area, when weighed against limited public benefits, could not be justified under the statutory presumption against harm and NPPF paragraph 202.

Framework references: 199, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy D2, Policy D5, Policy HE1, Policy B4, Policy CP6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.