Planning appeal decision
Land South of Weycock Cottage, Milley Road, Waltham St Lawrence, Reading, Berkshire, RG10 0JR
Planning appeal 3288266 at Land South of Weycock Cottage, Milley Road, Waltham St Lawrence, Reading, Berkshire, RG10 0JR (Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead) was dismissed on 7 October 2022 by Inspector Tucker A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Construction of x1 detached dwelling with detached carport
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Tucker A
- Postcode
- RG10 0JR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the setting of the Waltham St. Lawrence Conservation Area
- The effect of the proposal on the recreational and amenity value of the right of way
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt with no very special circumstances to justify it, as the limited weight attributable to housing delivery and other considerations are clearly outweighed by substantial harm to the Green Belt, significant harm to its openness, harm to the Conservation Area setting, and significant harm to the recreational and amenity value of the right of way.
The harm to the Green Belt (to which substantial weight must be given), the significant adverse impact on openness, the harm to the Conservation Area setting, and the significantly harmful effect on the right of way were not clearly outweighed by the limited weight attributable to the delivery of a single dwelling and other considerations, and therefore very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy QP5Policy QP3Policy HE1Policy IF5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 202Paragraph 199Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed27 October 20266007126Grove Park Industrial Estate Waltham Road, White Waltham, Maidenhead, SL6 3JF
- Dismissed21 October 20266009694Land Adjacent to Stud Green Farm, Sturt Green, Holyport, SL62JH
- Dismissed4 September 202660092602 Island Cottages Stanwell Road, Horton, SL3 9PQ
- Notice upheld10 August 20263369085Land to the Side of 16 Halfway Houses, Maidenhead Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 6PP
- Dismissed27 July 20266008948Land To The North of Stubbings Farm Cottages, Burchetts Green Road Burchetts Green, Windsor And Maidenhead, Maidenhead, SL6 6QT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®