Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision18 July 20223288315

1A & 1C Elstree Gardens, Edmonton, LONDON, N9 8QY

rear extensions to existing flats 1A and 1C and creation of a studio flat within a new pitched roof

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Savage K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area

What decided it

The reduced massing of the rear dormer in Appeal B, which sits within the main roof slope with smaller proportionate windows, combined with the angled first floor extension that follows the neighbouring building line, creates a more proportionate scale of development that respects the surrounding pattern and preserves character and appearance.

Plan policies cited: Policy D4 of the London Plan (2021), Policy DMD6 of the Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD8 of the Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD11 of the Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD13 of the Development Management Document (2014), Policy DMD37 of the Development Management Document (2014), Policy CP30 of the Core Strategy (2010)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.