Planning appeal decision
Land to the Rear of Holmwood, The Street, Walsham Le Willows, Suffolk, IP31 3AZ
Planning appeal 3288571 at Land to the Rear of Holmwood, The Street, Walsham Le Willows, Suffolk, IP31 3AZ (Mid Suffolk District Council) was dismissed on 5 December 2022 by Inspector Grierson E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be in an appropriate location for new housing with regard to the local development strategy.
the construction of a single two-storey 4 bedroom dwelling including parking areas and landscaping
- Authority
- Mid Suffolk District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Grierson E
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be in an appropriate location for new housing with regard to the local development strategy
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, the setting of the nearby listed buildings and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Walsham Le Willows Conservation Area
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring dwellings, in relation to privacy, outlook and disturbance
- the effect of the proposed development on biodiversity
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the Walsham Le Willows Conservation Area and the significant harm to highway safety outweighed the limited public benefits of providing a single dwelling in a sustainable location.
The less than substantial harm to the heritage asset and significant highway safety harm were not outweighed by the limited public benefits of a single dwelling contribution to housing supply and rural community vitality, and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply due to the clear reason for refusal provided by heritage asset protection policies.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS1Policy CS2Policy FC1Policy FC1.1Policy GP1Policy H13Policy H15Policy H16Policy HB8Policy CS5Policy T9Policy T10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 79Paragraph 80
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed5 August 20266007731Hall Cottage, Stowmarket Road, Ringshall, IP14 2HZ
- Notice upheld12 March 20263357418Vale Farm The Common, Metfield, Harleston, IP20 0LP
- Allowed11 July 20253354473Camping Site And Premises Sudbourne Hall Farm, Mill Road, Wyverstone, Suffolk, IP14 4SE
- Dismissed28 April 20253358559Post Office, 7 Church Street, Eye, IP23 7BD
- Allowed25 April 202533554792 Thorney Green Road, Stowupland, Stowmarket, IP14 4BY
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®