Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 May 20223289058

Land Adjacent , 74-76 High Street , Moxley, Walsall, WS10 8SD

an additional two bedroom two storey unit joined onto one of the approved terraces under application ref. 18/0677

Authority
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Jones D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, and for occupiers of the neighbouring residential property, with particular regard to outlook, light and the provision of suitable outdoor amenity space

What decided it

The substantial and long-lasting harm to character and appearance and to living conditions of future occupiers significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of one additional dwelling when assessed against the Framework taken as a whole.

The substantial harm to character and appearance and living conditions was ascribed substantial weight and significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited weight given to economic and social benefits and housing supply contribution, such that the proposal did not represent sustainable development.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: saved Policy GP2 of the Walsall Unitary Development Plan (2005), saved Policy ENV32 of the Walsall Unitary Development Plan (2005), Policy ENV3 of the Black Country Core Strategy (2011), Policy DW3 of the Designing Walsall Supplementary Planning Document, Appendix D of the Designing Walsall Supplementary Planning Document

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.