Planning appeal decision
Land to the Rear of Attwood Terrace, Tudhoe Colliery, Spennymoor, DL16 6TG
Planning appeal 3289081 at Land to the Rear of Attwood Terrace, Tudhoe Colliery, Spennymoor, DL16 6TG (Durham County Council) was dismissed on 10 February 2022 by Inspector Hartley D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area/countryside including the setting of the Tudhoe Village Conservation Area.
36 dwellings (amended scheme) including demolition of buildings (outline – all matters reserved except access)
- Authority
- Durham County Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Hartley D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area/countryside including the setting of the Tudhoe Village Conservation Area
- the effect of the loss of on-street car parking and the proposed access on the living conditions of existing residents
- the effect of the proposal on highway/pedestrian safety
- whether it would be possible to achieve a satisfactory surface water management system
- the effect of the development on ecology
- whether adequate provision would be made for affordable housing
What decided it
The significant harm to character and appearance caused by the introduction of large-scale suburban-style development into a linear terraced settlement pattern, combined with unresolved highway safety and parking impacts, meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan and no material considerations indicated the decision should be made otherwise.
The benefits of boosting housing supply (moderate weight), provision of six affordable homes (positive weight), construction employment (limited weight) and economic activity (limited weight) were outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance, the countryside, and the living conditions of existing residents through loss of parking and highway safety impacts.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 6Policy 21Policy 25Policy 35Policy 41Policy 15County Durham Plan 2020
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 12Paragraph 111Paragraph 130Paragraph 169
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Durham County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed22 October 20266007418Land to the West of St Michael's Rise, Hawthorn, SR7 8BY
- Allowed10 September 2026600635255 Bradford Crescent, Gilesgate, Durham, DH1 1HL
- Dismissed11 August 20266006359The Copse, Foxes Row, Brancepeth, DH7 8DH
- Allowed24 July 20263375422Harehill Farm, Haswell Plough, Durham, Durham, DH6 2BA
- Allowed24 July 20266003014Land to the South of Wagtail Lane, Craghead, DH7 0DT
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®