Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 August 20223289083

14 Dovercourt Avenue, Thornton Heath, CR7 7LG

‘Demolition and erection of two storey side extension, construction of a single storey rear extension, and conversion of single dwelling into 3 flats (1 x 3 bed flat, 1 x 2 bed flat and 1 studio flat)’

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing building and surrounding area
  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory living accommodation for future occupiers, with particular reference to bedroom size in Flat C
  • whether the proposed development would provide satisfactory private amenity space for future occupiers, with particular reference to Flat B

What decided it

The proposed development would significantly detract from the character and appearance of the existing building and surrounding area through visually intrusive roof additions that fail to demonstrate high quality design, and would fail to provide satisfactory living accommodation due to the inadequate size and headroom of the bedroom in Flat C.

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan (adopted March 2021), Policy SP4 of the Croydon Local Plan (adopted 2018), Policy DM10 of the Croydon Local Plan (adopted 2018), Policy DM10.7 of the Croydon Local Plan (adopted 2018), Policy DM10.4 of the Croydon Local Plan (adopted 2018), Croydon Suburban Design Guide SPD 2019, London Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance 2016

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.