Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 July 20223289378

4 Ringmore Rise, LONDON, SE23 3DF

the erection of a rear extension and the subdivision of the property into 2 three-bedroom houses

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Poole S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 132 and 134 Westwood Park, with particular regard to outlook and privacy
  • whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to outlook
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety with regard to car parking stress in the area

What decided it

The proposal would cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers through further enclosure and loss of outlook, and would provide unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers due to poor bedroom outlook.

Plan policies cited: Policy 15 Lewisham Core Strategy (2011), Policy 31 Lewisham Development Management Plan (2014), Policy 32 Lewisham Development Management Plan (2014), Policy 29 Lewisham Development Management Plan (2014), Policy 14 Lewisham Core Strategy (2011), Policy D6 London Plan (2021)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.