Planning appeal decision
Land at Waters Edge, Lake 10, Cotswold Water Park, South Cerney, GL7 5QH
Planning appeal 3289555 at Land at Waters Edge, Lake 10, Cotswold Water Park, South Cerney, GL7 5QH (Cotswold District Council) was dismissed on 31 October 2022 by Inspector Page L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal is in an acceptable location.
outline planning application for the construction of 11no holiday homes along with access roads (including bridge), car parking, alterations to existing drainage ditch to create a new lagoon, creation of a new nature reserve area including alteration to land levels to create a new promontory on the southern shoreline, lowering of land on part of the western shoreline to create waterfowl habitat, erection of a bat barn, new reedbeds and other biodiversity enhancements and landscaping
- Authority
- Cotswold District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Page L
- Postcode
- GL7 5QH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal is in an acceptable location
- the effect of the proposal on ground and surface water
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposal on biodiversity
What decided it
The cumulative weight of two instances of significant conflict with the development plan (unacceptable location and insufficient drainage evidence) outweighed the significant benefit of biodiversity enhancements, and no material considerations of sufficient weight justified a decision contrary to the development plan.
Two instances of significant harm from conflict with the development plan (location and drainage) outweighed one instance of significant benefit (biodiversity enhancements of 16.81% net gain), with character and appearance neutral, and limited socio-economic benefits insufficient to overcome the conflict with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy EC11Policy SP5Policy EN15Policy EN2Policy EN4Policy INF7Policy EN8
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 55Paragraph 81Paragraph 174Paragraph 180
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cotswold
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed13 October 20266007597Kilkeney Inn, Andoversford, Cheltenham, GL54 4LN
- Dismissed6 October 20266010770100 Gloucester Road, Cirencester, GL7 2LW
- Allowed30 September 20266009635Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE
- Dismissed30 September 20266009631Stratton House Hotel, Gloucester Road, Stratton, GL7 2LE
- Allowed5 August 20266006284Land Parcel North Of Olimpick Drive, Chipping Campden, GL55 6BL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®