Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 June 20223289715

53D Sutton Drove, SEAFORD, BN25 3NQ

We are proposing to erect a wooden shed like structure to be utilised as a home office to the front of our property which is on a secluded part of our property and therefore not affecting other residents outlook or passers-by. There is a TPO on nearby trees at the property for which we have undertaken a Tree Survey & Arboricultural Impact Assessment (attached). Due to the result of this survey the base of the outbuilding will use mini screw pile foundations which will allow the construction to take place within the Root Protection Area without causing damage to roots, or soil compactions and will allow rain and air to reach the soil beneath the building. Also all documents regarding the size of the building accompany this application ”

Authority
Lewes District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Reid J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect that the proposed development would have on the character and appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposed outbuilding would harmfully intrude into the important openness of the front garden and appear unacceptably out of place from the nearby roads, contrary to the development plan policies on design and ancillary buildings.

Plan policies cited: Policy DM25, Policy DM29, Policy SE2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.