Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed11 July 20223289762

Plot C02, Liverpool Waters, Liverpool, L3 1DL

Planning appeal 3289762 at Plot C02, Liverpool Waters, Liverpool, L3 1DL (Liverpool City Council) was allowed on 11 July 2022 by Inspector Catchpole R, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area bearing in mind the special attention that should be paid to the desirability of preserving the setting of the nearby Grade II listed building, 'Waterloo Warehouse' (Ref: 1062576), and the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the setting of the Stanley Dock Conservation Area.

a residential development in three blocks, 4-9 storeys creating 330 residential units (C3), commercial at ground floor (E), partial infill of West Waterloo dock, floating timber jetty & dockside walkway with associated parking, public open space, servicing and landscaping

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Catchpole R
Postcode
L3 0BT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area bearing in mind the special attention that should be paid to the desirability of preserving the setting of the nearby Grade II listed building, 'Waterloo Warehouse' (Ref: 1062576), and the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the setting of the Stanley Dock Conservation Area
  • the effect of the proposal on the significance of the non-designated heritage asset, West Waterloo Dock
  • the effect of the proposal on the delivery of public open space comprising the Cultural Square as part of the wider Liverpool Waters Central Docks regeneration scheme
  • whether the proposed type of housing will satisfy local housing needs and support a housing offer that encourages a more diverse residential population
  • the benefits to be weighed in the planning balance, including any implications of not proceeding with the scheme

What decided it

The very significant public benefit of creating a development platform that would unlock delivery of the wider Liverpool Waters regeneration scheme and the adjacent Cultural Square outweighed the identified less than substantial heritage harm and housing mix policy conflicts.

the less than substantial heritage harm and housing mix policy conflicts did not significantly and demonstrably outweigh the very significant public benefits of unlocking the wider regeneration scheme, so the balance tipped in favour of granting permission

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CC12Policy CC10Policy STP2Policy UD1Policy UD2Policy UD3Policy UD4Policy UD5Policy HD1(1)Policy HD1(2)Policy H3(1)Policy H3(4)Policy CC24(1)(b)Policy GI5Policy TP5Policy TP6Policy EC6Policy H14Policy GI8Policy STP4Policy STP5Policy STP1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 200Paragraph 203Paragraph 128Paragraph 57Paragraph 56Paragraph 11
Judgments
R (Kinsey) v Lewisham LBC [2021] EWHC 1286 (Admin); Case C323/17 – People Over Wind and Sweetman 2018

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

85 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Liverpool City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Allowed16 October 20266010132
    Surface Car Park & Former Lma - Land at 77-83 & 85-89 Duke Street, Liverpool, L1 5AA
  2. Allowed6 October 20266010099
    33 Liscard Road, Liverpool, L15 0HH
  3. Dismissed9 September 20266008534
    356 Prescot Road, Liverpool, L13 3AP
  4. Allowed17 August 20266010623
    197 Alderson Road, Liverpool, L15 1HQ
  5. Dismissed17 August 20266009126
    6 Grenadier Drive, Liverpool, L12 4ZN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.