Planning appeal decision
Tola, 56 Peckham High Street, London, SE15 5DP
Planning appeal 3289883 at Tola, 56 Peckham High Street, London, SE15 5DP (London Borough of Southwark) was dismissed on 14 November 2022 by Inspector Savage M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the matters alleged in the enforcement notice constitute a breach of planning control (ground b).
the ‘retention of roof terrace with the following hours of operation: Monday to Thursday 10:00 to 03:00 (next day) Friday to Sunday 10:00 to 04:00 (next day)
- Authority
- London Borough of Southwark
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Savage M
- Postcode
- SE15 5DP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the matters alleged in the enforcement notice constitute a breach of planning control (ground b)
- Whether the matters alleged constitute development requiring planning permission (ground c)
- Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach (ground f)
- Whether the compliance period of 5 months is reasonable (ground g)
- The effect of the roof terrace on the living conditions of nearby occupants with regards to noise
- The character or appearance of the area bearing in mind location within Rye Lane Conservation Area and setting of Grade II listed building No 58
- The effect on the outlook of neighbouring properties due to excessive scale
What decided it
The noise generated by the open-air roof terrace is harmful to the living conditions of nearby residents, particularly at night, and the terrace's modern fencing and design fail to conserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Rye Lane Conservation Area, contrary to development plan policies and the Framework.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy P56Policy P13Policy P14Policy P20Policy D4 London Plan 2021Policy HC1 London Plan 2021
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 189Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Southwark
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed20 October 20266010489269-275 Rye Lane and 1A Philip Walk, London, SE15 4UA
- Allowed23 June 2026600731359 Lant Street and 6 Vine Yard, Southwark, SE1 1QN
- Notice upheld7 April 2026336141612 Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8RZ
- Dismissed7 April 20263344253Flat 1, 12 Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8RZ
- Notice varied and upheld5 February 20263364196211 Walworth Road, London, SE17 1RL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®