®Planning appeal decision
18 Iron Bridge Close, London, NW10 0UF
Planning appeal 3290112 at 18 Iron Bridge Close, London, NW10 0UF (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 10 March 2023 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposals would comply with paragraph AB.(2) of Class AB, having particular regard to whether the building is used for any purpose within Class B1(a) of the Schedule to the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987.
described as, “Prior approval for the construction of new dwellinghouse(s) on a terraced commercial / mixed use building: to extend the existing building upwards and create two additional floors of accommodation. There will be a total of four additional flats provided
- Authority
- London Borough of Brent
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- O'Doherty A
- Postcode
- NW10 0UF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposals would comply with paragraph AB.(2) of Class AB, having particular regard to whether the building is used for any purpose within Class B1(a) of the Schedule to the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987
- Whether the proposals would comply with paragraph AB.1.(o)(ii) of Class AB, having particular regard to whether development under Class AB(3)(d) would be situated on land forward of a wall forming the principal elevation of the existing building
- Whether the proposal would comply with paragraph AB.1(za) of Class AB, having particular regard to whether the permission to use the building as a dwellinghouse has been granted only by virtue of Class MA of Part 3 of Schedule 2 of the GPDO (Appeal B only)
- Whether the proposal would comply with paragraph AB.1.(o)(i) of Class AB, having particular regard to whether development under Class AB(3)(d) would extend beyond the curtilage of the existing building (Appeal B only)
- Whether the proposal complies with the nationally described space standard (Appeal B only)
What decided it
The building was not currently in use as an office (Class B1(a)) as required by paragraph AB.(2) of Class AB, and the proposed works would be situated forward of the principal elevation in breach of paragraph AB.1.(o)(ii), meaning the development would not constitute permitted development under the GPDO.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Brent
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed29 October 202660111767 Chalfont Avenue, Wembley, HA9 6NW
- Allowed22 October 20266011738102 West Hill, Wembley, HA9 9RR
- Allowed9 October 20266010212276 Willesden Lane, London, NW2 5RB
- Dismissed6 October 20266013509115 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6RY
- Allowed1 October 2026601160228A Ridley Road, London, NW10 5UA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.