Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 December 20223290553

Wheelspin, Salt Box Road, Worplesdon, Surrey, GU3 3TA

described on the application form as: ‘8m single storey rear extension and 2nd story on existing original building. All to be compliant with Permitted development under TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, ENGLAND The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015

Authority
Guildford Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Douglas L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether sufficient information has been provided to establish whether the proposal complies with the conditions, limitations or restrictions applicable to permitted development, with particular regard to whether it would extend beyond the rear wall of the original dwellinghouse by more than 8 metres and whether it would extend beyond a wall forming a side elevation of the original dwellinghouse and would have a width greater than half the width of the original dwellinghouse

What decided it

The appellant failed to provide sufficient information to enable the Inspector to establish whether the proposed development would comply with the GPDO limitations regarding rear and side wall extensions, particularly the location of the original building's walls as they existed on 1 July 1948.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.