Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 September 20223290633

1 - 44 Avalon Close, Enfield, EN2 8LR

Planning appeal 3290633 at 1 - 44 Avalon Close, Enfield, EN2 8LR (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 7 September 2022 by Inspector Jones H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development upon the privacy of existing residents on the third floor of 1-44 Avalon Close.

Construction of a part 3rd floor and 4th floor to both existing blocks to provide a total of 8 units (4 on each block) comprising 4 x 2 bed split level units, 2 x 2 bed flats and 2 x 1 bed flats; 8 additional car parking spaces, a bicycle store for 16 bikes plus 2 Sheffield stands and additional bins

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jones H
Postcode
EN2 8LR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the privacy of existing residents on the third floor of 1-44 Avalon Close

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the privacy of existing residents on the third floor caused by the revised communal staircase access arrangements and altered walking routes significantly and demonstrably outweighs the substantial weight given to the delivery of 8 new housing units.

The substantial weight given to the delivery of 8 housing units was significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the harm to the living conditions of existing residents in respect of privacy

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D6 of the London Plan, 2021Policy DMD8 of the Enfield Development Management Document, 2014Policy CP4 of the Enfield Core Strategy 2010Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy 2010
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

206 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.