Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 July 20223291053

93 Burleigh Gardens, Southgate, London, N14 5AJ

Planning appeal 3291053 at 93 Burleigh Gardens, Southgate, London, N14 5AJ (London Borough of Enfield) was allowed on 13 July 2022 by Inspector Wallis D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area including the special interest of Southgate Circus Conservation Area.

Change of use of existing building and part 3rd floor extension, fourth floor roof extension to provide an additional floor and rear four storey extension, enclosure of existing external staircase, to provide 107 bed hotel with associated external alterations, landscaping and car parking

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Major retail and services
Inspector
Wallis D
Postcode
N14 5AJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area including the special interest of Southgate Circus Conservation Area
  • the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with particular regard to light, outlook and privacy
  • the highway network

What decided it

The principle of a hotel use had already been established through the prior grant of planning permission for a 66-bed hotel on the same site, and the proposed development would not introduce a new use or result in an over-concentration of hotel uses in the locality.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
HC1CP30CP31DMD31DM44D4D5D8T6DMD45DMD6DMD8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 201Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

494 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  4. Dismissed20 July 20266010350
    19 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
  5. Dismissed3 June 20266004803
    1 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.