Planning appeal decision
Land To The North Of 28 North Terrace, Seaham, SR7 7EU
Planning appeal 3291116 at Land To The North Of 28 North Terrace, Seaham, SR7 7EU (Durham County Council) was dismissed on 14 April 2022 by Inspector Wraight G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Seaham Conservation Area.
Erection of 1 no. 4 storey building comprising 3 no. units (use class E(a)(b)(c) or Sui Generis drinking establishment) to ground floor, 1 no. unit (use class E(d)) to first and second floor and 4 no. residential units (C3) ancillary to the commercial units to third floor
- Authority
- Durham County Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- mixed-use · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wraight G
- Postcode
- SR7 7EU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the Seaham Conservation Area
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of nearby dwellings
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with reference to parking demand and provision
What decided it
The harm to the character and appearance of the Seaham Conservation Area caused by the proposal's excessive scale and visual dominance was not outweighed by the moderate public benefits offered.
The moderate public benefits of site recycling, active frontage and employment creation were outweighed by the less than substantial harm to the conservation area, to which considerable importance and weight was attached by virtue of the statutory duty to preserve or enhance its character and appearance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 29Policy 44Policy 31Policy 21
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 202Paragraph 111
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Durham County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed10 September 2026600635255 Bradford Crescent, Gilesgate, Durham, DH1 1HL
- Dismissed11 August 20266006359The Copse, Foxes Row, Brancepeth, DH7 8DH
- Allowed11 May 20266002307Applegarth, New Road, Crook, Durham, DL15 8NB
- Allowed7 May 20263376424Former Hallgarth Care Home, Hallgarth Street, Durham, County Durham, DH1 3AY
- Dismissed6 May 2026600330053 Frank Street, Gilesgate Moor, Durham, DH1 2JF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®