Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 September 20233291156

306 Main Road, Kesgrave, Ipswich, IP5 2PS

Planning appeal 3291156 at 306 Main Road, Kesgrave, Ipswich, IP5 2PS (East Suffolk) was dismissed on 15 September 2023 by Inspector Wallace J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is a suitable location for development having regard to the settlement hierarchy and development strategy for the authority, and if it is not, whether there are any material considerations that would justify reaching a different conclusion.

Redevelopment to provide 3 dwellings with associated access, parking and landscaping

Authority
East Suffolk
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wallace J
Postcode
IP5 2PS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is a suitable location for development having regard to the settlement hierarchy and development strategy for the authority, and if it is not, whether there are any material considerations that would justify reaching a different conclusion
  • the effect of the development on the integrity of habitats sites

What decided it

The absence of a securing mechanism to ensure the financial contribution towards habitats mitigation would be used for the measures set out in the RAMS meant the proposal could not be concluded to adequately mitigate its likely significant adverse effect on the integrity of the designated habitats sites.

the benefits of the scheme (housing delivery, economic benefits, biodiversity enhancements and efficient use of previously developed land) would outweigh the conflict with development plan location policies, but this was outweighed by the unmitigated adverse effect on habitats site integrity

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SCLP3.2SCLP3.3SCLP5.3SCLP5.4SCLP5.5SCLP5.6SCLP5.11SCLP10.1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 60Paragraph 69Paragraph 119Paragraph 120Paragraph 80Paragraph 15

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

31 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Suffolk

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266002993
    17 Market Place, Southwold, IP18 6EB
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266002990
    17 Market Place, Southwold, IP18 6EB
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266009600
    Part Land Rear Of Grove Cottage, The Street, Little Bealings, IP13 6LT
  4. Dismissed27 October 20266003858
    27 Sun Lane, Woodbridge, IP12 1EG
  5. Dismissed27 October 20266003855
    27 Sun Lane, Woodbridge, IP12 1EG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.