Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 September 20233291156

306 Main Road, Kesgrave, IPSWICH, IP5 2PS

Redevelopment to provide 3 dwellings with associated access, parking and landscaping

Authority
East Suffolk
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wallace J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the site is a suitable location for development having regard to the settlement hierarchy and development strategy for the authority, and if it is not, whether there are any material considerations that would justify reaching a different conclusion
  • the effect of the development on the integrity of habitats sites

What decided it

The absence of a securing mechanism to ensure the financial contribution towards habitats mitigation would be used for the measures set out in the RAMS meant the proposal could not be concluded to adequately mitigate its likely significant adverse effect on the integrity of the designated habitats sites.

the benefits of the scheme (housing delivery, economic benefits, biodiversity enhancements and efficient use of previously developed land) would outweigh the conflict with development plan location policies, but this was outweighed by the unmitigated adverse effect on habitats site integrity

Framework references: 60, 69, 119, 120, 80, 15

Plan policies cited: SCLP3.2, SCLP3.3, SCLP5.3, SCLP5.4, SCLP5.5, SCLP5.6, SCLP5.11, SCLP10.1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.