Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 November 20223291291

62 Braemar Gardens, WEST WICKHAM, BR4 0JW

demolition of two storey side extension and erection of an attached 4 bed, one and two storey dwellinghouse (with accommodation in the roofspace), together with associated landscaping, bin store, cycle store, and off-street frontage parking from existing vehicular access in Braemar Gardens

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
White P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of Nos 26-38 and No 35, with regard to outlook

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area, arising from the cumulative visual effects of extensive development at first floor and roof level across the original pair and the proposed dwelling, outweighed the limited benefits of a single additional dwelling in an area with low public transport accessibility.

the modest contribution to housing supply and effective use of land were outweighed by significant harm to character and appearance and conflict with development plan policies and the Framework, such that the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits and the presumption in favour of sustainable development did not apply

Framework references: 11, 12

Plan policies cited: London Borough of Bromley Local Plan 2019 Policy 4, London Borough of Bromley Local Plan 2019 Policy 37, London Plan 2021

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.