Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 February 20233291315

Land rear of 31-53 Northbourne Road, Twydall, Gillingham, Medway, ME8 6QH

the redevelopment of the site for a residential development comprising 7 residential units with private amenity space, car parking and landscaping

Authority
Medway Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Douglas L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers of the dwellings at plots 1 and 2, with particular regard to outlook
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 53 Northbourne Road, with particular regard to outlook and privacy

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance combined with unacceptable living conditions for future occupiers at plots 1 and 2 significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing and economic benefits, particularly given the Framework's emphasis on high-quality design and healthy living conditions.

The adverse impacts of the proposal, comprising significant harm to character and appearance and significant harm to living conditions of future occupiers, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery, economic activity, and biodiversity net gain when assessed against the policies in the Framework taken as a whole.

Framework references: 11, 69, 119, 126, 130

Plan policies cited: Saved Policy H4, Saved Policy H9, Saved Policy BNE1, Saved Policy BNE2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.