Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed20 February 20233291446

Eastfield Stables, May Walk, Stansted, Essex, CM24 8SS

improvement of existing vehicular access point and the construction of a single storey wellness hub building and associated car, cycle and motorcycle parking area

Authority
Uttlesford District Council
Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Unknown
Inspector
Smith D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would be in a suitable location having regard to relevant national and local policies
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the countryside

What decided it

The Framework's presumption in favour of sustainable development and support for business expansion in rural areas, combined with the out-of-date status of the conflicting local plan policies, outweighed the development plan conflict and limited harm to countryside character.

The conflict with the development plan and limited harm to countryside character were outweighed by the considerable benefits of supporting the rural economy and enabling healthy lifestyles, with the Framework's presumption in favour of sustainable development applying under paragraph 11(d)

Framework references: 85, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy S7, Policy GEN1, Policy RS3, Policy RS1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.