Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 November 20223291531

33 Perry Mead, Enfield, EN2 8BP

Technical Details Consent for the construction of three-storey building of 5 dwellings with associated landscaping and parking

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Wilson L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with regard to the provision of internal space and private amenity space, privacy and outlook
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of 33 Perry Mead, with regard to outlook and light
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety
  • The effect of the proposed development on drainage and flooding
  • Whether or not the proposed development provides appropriate cycle storage

What decided it

The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance, unacceptable living conditions for future occupants, and harm to neighbouring amenity significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery.

The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance, unacceptable living conditions for future occupants, and harm to neighbouring amenity significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery when assessed against the policies of the Framework taken as a whole.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy CP30, Policy CP31, Policy CP4, Policy CP21, Policy CP28, Policy CP25, Policy DMD6, Policy DMD8, Policy DMD9, Policy DMD11, Policy DMD37, Policy DMD47, Policy DMD45, Policy DMD48, Policy DMD59, Policy DMD60, Policy DMD61, Policy DMD62, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy D6, Policy T6, Policy T6.1, Policy T5, Policy SI 12, Policy SI 13

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.