®Planning appeal decision
33 Perry Mead, Enfield, EN2 8BP
Planning appeal 3291531 at 33 Perry Mead, Enfield, EN2 8BP (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 2 November 2022 by Inspector Wilson L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.
Technical Details Consent for the construction of three-storey building of 5 dwellings with associated landscaping and parking
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Wilson L
- Postcode
- EN2 8BP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupants, with regard to the provision of internal space and private amenity space, privacy and outlook
- The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupants of 33 Perry Mead, with regard to outlook and light
- The effect of the proposed development on highway safety
- The effect of the proposed development on drainage and flooding
- Whether or not the proposed development provides appropriate cycle storage
What decided it
The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance, unacceptable living conditions for future occupants, and harm to neighbouring amenity significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery.
The adverse impacts of harm to character and appearance, unacceptable living conditions for future occupants, and harm to neighbouring amenity significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery when assessed against the policies of the Framework taken as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP30Policy CP31Policy CP4Policy CP21Policy CP28Policy CP25Policy DMD6Policy DMD8Policy DMD9Policy DMD11Policy DMD37Policy DMD47Policy DMD45Policy DMD48Policy DMD59Policy DMD60Policy DMD61Policy DMD62Policy D3Policy D4Policy D6Policy T6Policy T6.1Policy T5Policy SI 12Policy SI 13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Allowed28 August 202660083619 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
- Dismissed20 July 2026601035019 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
- Dismissed3 June 202660048031 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.