Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 April 20233291557

Former David Lloyd Tennis Club, Greenford Road, Greenford, UB6 0UX

Planning appeal 3291557 at Former David Lloyd Tennis Club, Greenford Road, Greenford, UB6 0UX (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 18 April 2023 by Inspector O'Brien L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the MOL, including any effect on openness, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.

Change of use from tennis court (Use Class F2(c) to external car storage (Use Class B8); installation of fence; installation of door

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
O'Brien L
Postcode
UB6 0UX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the MOL, including any effect on openness, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal would cause substantial harm to the openness of the MOL as inappropriate development, and the limited benefits identified do not clearly outweigh this harm to justify very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy G3 London Plan 2021Policy G2 London Plan 2021Policy 2.18 Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document 2013
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 151

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

303 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed22 May 20233305443
    64 Clovelly Road, London, W5 5HE
  2. Dismissed27 October 20266014340
    21 Northcote Avenue, Southall, UB1 2AX
  3. Dismissed27 October 20266013917
    94 Pitshanger Lane, Ealing, London, W5 1QX
  4. Dismissed27 October 20266012839
    Station Parade, Advertising Right Adj 1 Uxbridge Road, Ealing, W5 3LD
  5. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.