Planning appeal decision
1, Cherry Lane, York, YO24 1QH
Planning appeal 3291862 at 1, Cherry Lane, York, YO24 1QH (City of York Council) was dismissed on 7 July 2022 by Inspector Milliken M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the special historic interest of heritage assets, including nearby listed buildings, with particular regard to their setting and whether or not the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Tadcaster Road Conservation Area.
the erection of 60no. retirement apartments with care, communal facilities, parking, landscaping and associated amenity space following demolition of existing 3no. bungalows
- Authority
- City of York Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Milliken M
- Postcode
- YO24 1QH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposed development on the special historic interest of heritage assets, including nearby listed buildings, with particular regard to their setting and whether or not the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Tadcaster Road Conservation Area
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, with particular regard to the streetscene
- The possible operational implications for York Racecourse, with particular regard to the working environment of the adjacent stables in relation to any noise and lighting
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the listed building and conservation area was not outweighed by the public benefits of the proposal, and the statutory duty to preserve heritage assets could not be satisfied.
The public benefits of specialist housing delivery and financial contributions were outweighed by the less than substantial harm to the listed building's setting and the conservation area's character and appearance, with the statutory heritage duty given considerable weight.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D1Policy D4Policy D5
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 130Paragraph 187Paragraph 199Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- Rectory Homes Ltd v SSHCLG and South Oxfordshire DC [2020] EWHC 2098 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in City of York Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed13 October 20266009484York Sports Club, Shipton Road, York, YO30 5RE
- Allowed25 September 202660113514 Vine Street, York, YO23 1BB
- Dismissed5 June 202660071721 Leven Road, York, YO24 2TL
- Allowed7 May 2026600286314 Main Street Heslington, York, YO10 5EA
- Dismissed20 March 2026337638356 Sycamore Terrace, York, YO30 7DN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®