Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent 2 New Meadow, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP21 7AN
Planning appeal 3291937 at Land Adjacent 2 New Meadow, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP21 7AN (Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area *) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 24 July 2023 by Inspector Moss J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A ground (e): whether copies of the enforcement notice were served as required by section 172 of the 1990 Act.
Without planning permission, the change of use of land from amenity land to residential land and the erection of a garage and creation of a hardstanding driveway. The requirements of the notice are: Step 1: Cease the use of the land for residential purposes. Step 2: Permanently remove (demolish) the garage structure (including foundations) and the driveway (including any base layers) from the Land and ensure all arising materials and debris are removed from the Land. Step 3: Topsoil the land level with the adjacent amenity land and spread grass seed. The period for compliance with the requirements is three months of the notice taking effect. The appeal is proceeding on the grounds set out in section 174(2)(b), (d) and (e) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 as amended. Summary
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Moss J
- Postcode
- HP21 7AN
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Appeal A ground (e): whether copies of the enforcement notice were served as required by section 172 of the 1990 Act
- Appeal A ground (b): whether the erection of a garage has occurred
- Appeal A ground (d) and Appeal B: whether the material change of use of land to residential use incidental to the dwellinghouse had been continuous for ten years prior to the enforcement notice and LDC application respectively
- Appeal A ground (d): whether the hardstanding driveway had been substantially completed more than four years prior to the enforcement notice
- Appeal C: the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
What decided it
For Appeals A and B, the decisive factor was the credible and consistent evidence from statutory declarations establishing that the residential use incidental to the dwellinghouse had been continuous since 2006, exceeding the ten-year threshold for lawfulness. For Appeal C, the decisive factor was that the conversion of open amenity land to private residential garden use resulted in a significant encroachment that harmed the spacious character and pleasant appearance of the residential estate.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy BE2 (Design of New Development) of Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan 2013 – 2033 adopted September 2021
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 130
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Notice upheld30 September 20263370104New Bengal Blue, 17-19 Walton Road, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP21 7SR
- Notice upheld18 September 20263354830Una's Newsagency, 5 Buckingham Street, Aylesbury, HP20 2LA
- Planning permission granted8 April 20263349243The Green Man, 32 Market Square, Aylesbury, HP20 1TW
- Planning permission granted8 April 20263349240The Green Man, 32 Market Square, Aylesbury, HP20 1TW
- Unknown8 April 20263349212The Green Man, 32 Market Square, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP20 1TW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®