Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld28 June 20223292045

Land to the Rear of Grime Lane, Sharlston Common, Wakefield, WF4 1EJ

Planning appeal 3292045 at Land to the Rear of Grime Lane, Sharlston Common, Wakefield, WF4 1EJ (Wakefield Metropolitan District Council) was dismissed on 28 June 2022 by Inspector Gray E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the development amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and any relevant development plan policies.

‘retrospective planning for a garden room, with storage, on a piece of land that is garden to the property but is not within curtilage of the house’

Authority
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Gray E
Postcode
WF4 1EJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the development amounts to inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The development is inappropriate development in the Green Belt that causes harm to openness, and the appellant has failed to demonstrate very special circumstances that clearly outweigh this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS1Policy CS10
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

22 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wakefield Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Notice varied and upheld1 September 20263371510
    25 Milton Street, Wakefield, WF2 8TL
  2. Notice varied and upheld24 August 20263361281
    Wragby Grange, Doncaster Road, Wragby, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF4 1QX
  3. Dismissed10 August 20266004277
    Land At Back Lane, Woolley, Wakefield, WF4 2JT
  4. Notice varied and upheld6 August 20263363754
    Land at Greenfield Road, Normanton, WF6 2JD
  5. Notice upheld24 July 20263375942
    Land at Unit 8 Back Grantley Street, Wakefield, WF1 4LG

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.